<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A judicial climbdown on McKenzie friending in Scotland &#8211; almost, but not quite&#8230; YET</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mckenziefriend.com/2010/02/24/a-judicial-climbdown-on-mckenzie-friending-in-scotland-almost-but-not-quite-yet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mckenziefriend.com/2010/02/24/a-judicial-climbdown-on-mckenzie-friending-in-scotland-almost-but-not-quite-yet/</link>
	<description>brought to you by leading McKenzie Friend and Lay Advocate, John Junk of www.familycourtsupport.co.uk</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 13:03:17 +0200</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Consumer legal chiefs question Lord Hamilton’s plans for McKenzie Friends as calls grow for fairer deal for Scots court users &#171; A Diary of Injustice in Scotland</title>
		<link>http://www.mckenziefriend.com/2010/02/24/a-judicial-climbdown-on-mckenzie-friending-in-scotland-almost-but-not-quite-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator>Consumer legal chiefs question Lord Hamilton’s plans for McKenzie Friends as calls grow for fairer deal for Scots court users &#171; A Diary of Injustice in Scotland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 17:47:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mckenziefriend.com/?p=603#comment-73</guid>
		<description>[...] The thorny issue of remuneration for a McKenzie Friend which Lord Hamilton appears determined to prevent, also takes a battering as case law in England has already established McKenzie Friends can charge for their services, an issue taken up HERE [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The thorny issue of remuneration for a McKenzie Friend which Lord Hamilton appears determined to prevent, also takes a battering as case law in England has already established McKenzie Friends can charge for their services, an issue taken up HERE [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://www.mckenziefriend.com/2010/02/24/a-judicial-climbdown-on-mckenzie-friending-in-scotland-almost-but-not-quite-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-70</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 10:12:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mckenziefriend.com/?p=603#comment-70</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by famcourtsupport: A judicial climbdown on McKenzie friending in Scotland - almost, but not quite... YET http://bit.ly/bkSQ9O...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by famcourtsupport: A judicial climbdown on McKenzie friending in Scotland &#8211; almost, but not quite&#8230; YET <a href="http://bit.ly/bkSQ9O.." rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/bkSQ9O..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
